|
HSO Vammaisfoorumi ry
(Finnish Disability Forum)
MHE-SME
Inclusion Europe
Under the auspices of the: European Disability Forum
With the support of the European Commission
Preparatory actions to combat and prevent social exclusion
The information contained in this report does not necessarily reflect the
opinion of the European Commission
This study, funded by the European Commission DG Employment and Social
Affairs(Project Number VP/2000/008-query), was achieved through the partnership of 7disability organizations under the coordination of the Greek National
Confederation of Disabled People, and under the auspices of the European Disability Forum.
The title of the project is:
"Disability and Social Exclusion in the EU – time for change, tools
for change"
The project aims at the collection of quantitative and qualitative
information on poverty and social exclusion faced by people with disabilities. A questionnaire was
designed and circulated between May-July 2001in several European Countries. This study report
is the result of an analysis of the information gathered and of the comments of over
100 participants from disability organisations, decision makers, and other
stakeholders attending a conference in March 2002 in Athens, where a draft report was
presented.
The co-ordination of the study was undertaken by the Greek National
Confederation of Disabled People The partner organizations involved in the project were the
National Councils of disabled people in Greece, Spain, France, Finland, Sweden, and the
following European Non Governmental Organisations: the European Blind Union, Inclusion Europe , and Mental Health Europe (See Appendix I). They all played an
active role in designing the study, translating the questionnaire, disseminating
it including through seminars, collecting the data, and contributing to the content of the
report. The European Disability Forum (EDF), an umbrella organization gathering 17 National
Councils in the European Union and European Economic Area, and over 70 European NGOs (including all the partners of this project) was also involved.
Professor Yannis Yfantopoulos of the University of Athens provided his
invaluable expertise on statistical and methodological tools for the design of the
questionnaire and study, and for the analysis of data collected.
CONTENTS
I. FOREWORD
II. PREFACE
III. INTRODUCTION
1.THE EUROPEAN POLITICAL CONTEXT
1.1 TOWARDS SOCIAL INCLUSION
1.2 DISABLED PEOPLE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
1.2.1 Education
1.2.2 Employment
2.PURPOSE AND METHOD OF THE STUDY
3. EMPIRICAL FINDINGS
3.1 IDENTITY OF RESPONDENTS
3.2 MINIMUM INCOME AND DISABILITY BENEFITS
3.3 DISABILITY BENEFITS
3.4 EDUCATION
3.5 EMPLOYMENT
3.6 ACCESS TO GOODS AND SERVICES
3. 6. 1 Health and Social services
3.6.2 Public Administration
3.6.3 Social Environment
3.6.4 Transport
3.6.5 Information Society
3.6.6 Availability of Social Services
4 ASSESSMENT OF NATIONAL POLICIES FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION
5. FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SOCIAL EXCLUSION
6. POLICY CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS FOR ACTION
6.1 Disabled people and poverty
6.2 Education
6.3 Employment
6.4 Access to health and social services
6.5 Public Administration
6.6 Social Environment
6.7 Transport
6.8 Information Society
6.9 Availability of services
6.10 General Conclusions
APPENDIX I
1. ORGANISATIONS INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT
APPENDIX II
1. THE DESIGN OF A QUESTIONNAIRE
2. DISSEMINATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE
APPENDIX III– REFERENCES

I. FOREWORD
People with disabilities are undoubtedly among the most vulnerable at risk of
social exclusion, as this valuable study clearly shows. Poverty and social exclusion
are inextricably linked, and a major cause of poverty is the lack of employment. For
people with disabilities, the situation with regard to employment is far from ideal. On
average,the participation rate of severely disabled people in the workforce is less than
half that of able-bodied workers. Efforts have been made in most EU Member States to improve
the participation rate but the obstacles to gaining - and retaining -employment,
such as lack of access to education and to vocational training, limited availability of housing,
assistive technology and accessible transport are still significant. The study findings
illustrate very well where more work is needed.
The study also highlights the link between social exclusion and
discrimination. The major European level legally binding policy instrument is the Anti-Discrimination
Directive, passed in 2000 by Council, which enters into force next year. The Directive will
help to protect people with disabilities against discrimination in the workplace. It
will also require employers to provide, where reasonably possible, facilities to permit
people with disabilities to participate in the workforce. Directorate-General for
Employment
and Social Affairs has created a network of legal advisors who are monitoring the
implementation of the Directive at national level. A complimentary instrument is
the
National Action Plan to combat poverty and social exclusion, which each Member
State produces. The NAPs, like the study's findings, reveal that significant
improvements are still to be made in particular with regard to access to education and housing
systems to make them more responsive to the needs of workers with disabilities. Future NAPs
will build on this information and report progress.
Promoting the rights, and raising the level of awareness of people with
disabilities is also the main objective of the European Year of People with Disabilities 2003. We
hope the Year will encourage reflection, discussion and action about measures required to
promote equal opportunities, and that it will challenge the barriers, also identified in
this study, that prevent people with disabilities from participating in many aspects of everyday
life.
The challenge now is to deliver for people with disabilities not just life,
but quality of life and to identify and provide opportunities for full social inclusion. I commend
EDF and its partnership disability organizations for this powerful contribution towards
meeting that challenge.
Anna Diamantopoulou,
European Commissioner on Employment and Social Affairs
II. PREFACE
The National Confederation of Disabled People in Greece decided in early
2000, together with National Councils from Spain, France, Finland, Sweden, and Spain, and with
3 European Non Governmental Organisations, representing major impairment groups:
Mental Health Europe, Inclusion Europe, and the European Blind Union, to launch
a common project, under the auspices of the European Disability Forum, within the
framework of the European Community preparatory actions on social exclusion.
The Lisbon strategy had just been launched, putting for the first time social
exclusion high on the European Union agenda. The European Council had set ambitious objectives
aiming at reducing considerably poverty and social exclusion by the end of the
decade.
Disabled people are a group at high risk of social exclusion because of the
physical, legal, financial, and attitudinal barriers from society that they face in their
everyday life. The high vulnerability of disabled women and men was recognised by the Nice European
Council in December 2000, in the common EU objectives on social inclusion.
Despite this, quantitative information on the situation of disabled people in
Europe, and to their level of participation in society is scarce, and therefore there is little
understanding of the causes of their social exclusion both at National and European level.
By implementing this project, we were convinced that in order to achieve
progress in the fight against disabled people, it was crucial to investigate the link between
social exclusion and disability, from the perspective of disabled people and families
of disabled people unable to represent themselves. At the same time we wanted our project to
contribute to the development of policy indicators and actions for the fight
against social exclusion.
This study, which is the result of the commitment of all the project
partners, of the contributions of over 150 associations of disabled people across Europe, and of
discussions held at our final conference in Athens last March, is a step forward
in this sense.
The report provides information on the causes of poverty and exclusion of
disabled people and their families in the areas identified by the Council's objectives. The
study shows that poverty is a reality for many households with a disabled person. A great
financial strain is put on them because of the extra costs related to disability and the failure of
the social protection systems to adequately address this.
Disabled people are also confronted with social exclusion from their youngest
age because of discrimination and of barriers existing in society. The education
systems fail in may cases to integrate children with disabilities in the mainstream school
environment.
Furthermore only less than a third of disabled people in working age are in
employment, often in low paid jobs. The lack of adaptation of the working place together
with thepre judice of employers is the main obstacle to employment.
Moreover social services are often lacking or inadequate, not contributing to
an autonomous and participatory life.
Overall social participation of disabled people is seriously restricted as
physical and attitudinal barriers prevent them from participating in the life of the
community, or even
in exerting their citizenship rights.
The outcomes of this project show that the involvement of people suffering
from social exclusion is essential in identifying the causes, in developing actions to
counter this phenomenon, and in assessing policies.
We believe that its findings could greatly contribute to the strengthening of
current EU indicators, and to the next round of the National action plans on social
inclusion, that will be adopted next year.
In 2003 the European Union will also celebrate the European Year of People
with Disabilities. We are convinced that a reinforcement of social inclusion policies
for disabled people will be a major contribution to the Year, as well as to achieve
a more inclusive Europe.
Finally I would like to thank all the project partners, and all those that
have contributed directly or indirectly to the project, and in particular, the European
Commission without which this project and its achievements would not have been possible.
Yannis Vardakastanis
President of NCDP
Project Leader

III. INTRODUCTION
Social exclusion is a multidimensional phenomenon, which is linked not only
to income and expenditure but also to activity status, educational attainment, housing,
health, subjective assessment in making ends meet, and citizens' satisfaction with
health and welfare services.
Overall in the EU, there are certain groups of people who are at risk of
poverty and social exclusion. These include people who are unemployed, the elderly, and disabled
people. There is a growing need to collect comparable data and develop multidisciplinary
and vertical indicators, which could capture the dynamic aspects of a changing EU
Society.
Co-operation must be developed between the European Commission, the Member
States, in consultation with representative disability organisations, in order to
develop harmonized research strategies and implement effective social policies.
The fight against poverty and social exclusion constitutes one of the major
objectives of the European Social Model. According to Article 137 of the Amsterdam Treaty,
Member States are encouraged to develop initiatives aimed at improving knowledge, to
exchange information, to promote new approaches, and evaluate good practices and to
design new policies. Furthermore, Article 13 enables the Council to take appropriate
actions to combat discrimination based on disability and invites the Community Institutions
to take account "of the needs of persons with a disability when adopting
measures" and implementing legislation.
The Commission in its Communication "Building an Inclusive Europe"
, invites the Member States to strengthen their commitment and to promote greater solidarity
for more inclusive economies and societies: "The challenge is not only to provide a
better assistance to those excluded (or at risk of exclusion), but also to actively
address the structural barriers to social inclusion thus reducing the incidences of social
exclusion."
The European Commission recognises that people with disabilities, confront
multiple barriers in accessing the labour market, social services, education and face
high risks of becoming poor and socially excluded.
The Portuguese presidency has highlighted the magnitude of the problem and
provided detailed information on developing coherent policies. The Nice European Council
has endorsed the need to develop common actions and policies addressed to specific
groups like the unemployed, the elderly and disabled people. The multi-dimensional nature of the problem requires the development of a
common strategy aiming at the assessment of the needs of disabled people. Despite the
increasing
literature on comparative research, in the area of disability, there is a
considerable lack of comparative statistics on the living conditions of disabled people, the
systematic discrimination, and the barriers with which they are confronted in their social
and economic environment. Furthermore, the policies developed in each Member State
are of a sporadic nature and vary significantly from one Country to another.
The aim of this project was to produce a report to be used as a reference
tool on the link between disability, and social exclusion for policy makers, and practitioners
involved either directly or indirectly in the social inclusion strategy at European and
National level.
The study should serve to:
-
to develop a methodology for assessing the causal factors of social
exclusion among disabled people
-
to collect comparable quantitative and qualitative information with existing
European data, in order to provide disability specific indicators to measure
this phenomenon, and to evaluate impact of policy measures devised to combat social exclusion of disabled people.
-
To identify areas where policy action is needed, and propose the establishment
of policies and measures to facilitate social inclusion of people with disabilities
A fully harmonised questionnaire targeted at organisations of disabled people
was used to obtain relevant policy information for the disability movement in the EU
countries. The questionnaire covered areas most relevant to disabled people in the framework of
social exclusion, and poverty: minimum income and disability benefits, education,
employment, access to goods and services, availability of services infrastructures, and
evaluation of National policies.
The analysis of findings and conclusions of the study were further
complemented by discussions taking part at a European Conference held in Athens in March 2002,
gathering over 100 people from disability organisations, decisions makers, and
other stakeholders in the social field. The participants discussed the content of the
report, and provided contributions in the framework of three workshops targeting the main
areas of the study: income and social protection, access to education, access to
employment,
access to goods and services.
Prof Yannis Yfantopoulos,
University of Athens
Greece
1. THE EUROPEAN POLITICAL CONTEXT
1.1 TOWARDS SOCIAL INCLUSION
The European Union has recognised from its onset the need to achieve social
cohesion, next to the development of an internal market. Tremendous social progress has
been achieved since the Treaty of Rome in improving living conditions, well-being,
life expectancy, education, and quality of life.
However, at the start of the 21st century, more than 65 million people,
around 18% of the European population, still live on the verge of poverty, earning only 60% of the
national median income. The most vulnerable groups at risk of poverty are unemployed,
elderly and disabled people
Policy makers have therefore realised the need to respond at European Union,
as well as National level to these new challenges.
A specific article on the fight against social exclusion was adopted in the
Amsterdam Treaty in 1997, setting the foundations for a European Social Inclusion Policy.
In February 2000, the European Commission announced a new set of objectives
for «shaping social Europe» and developing a framework for social and economic
policies. A five-year action plan covering the period 2000-2005 was adopted promoting the
interrelationship between economic dynamism, full employment, and greater social
justice among Member States. The interplay between economic growth, employment
and social cohesion is depicted in diagram 1:
Diagram 1: THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL MODEL
Source: Social Situation Report 2001
The Lisbon Summit gave then a new impetus to the European Social Model by
stating "Europe should become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based
society in the world capable of sustainable economic growth with better jobs and greater
social cohesion".
The Lisbon Summit examined the existing policies against poverty and social
exclusion and called Member States to:
-
Promote more and better employment opportunities as a safeguard against
poverty and social exclusion
-
Ensure access to knowledge based society by addressing issues such as
information technology, education and training, cultural integration, Strengthen social inclusion policies based on the close co-operation among the
Member States.
-
Reform social transfers towards active investment in human capital.
The Nice Summit provided the political basis for the consolidation of a
Social Agenda in Europe by reinforcing "the modernisation of the European Social Model"
and emphasising the "indissoluble link between economic performance and social
progress".
The synergy of the triad: democracy, economy and society constitute the new
philosophy of the European Social Model. It was agreed that a new, "Open Method of Co-ordination" should be established among the Member States promoting:
The launching of National Action Plans to combat Poverty and Social Exclusion for the
period 2001-2003;
The establishment of a Community Action Programme for the period 2001 to 2005 to encourage cooperation, developing exchange of information and best
practices, between Member States in order to achieve a better understanding of the phenomenon of social exclusion and develop and actions with a budget of
70 million Euros.

1.2 DISABLED PEOPLE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
Several International Organizations like the OECD, ILO, WHO and the European
Commission (Eurostat, the European Union Statistical Office) have launched
studies to measure the number of persons with disabilities. Although there are
methodological differences concerning the definition of disability and the collection of data,
there is a common agreement on the proportion of disabled people compared to the total
European Population.
Eurostat has published two main studies on disabled people in 1995 and 2001.
In the 1995 study , Eurostat indicates that the proportion of disabled people compared to
the total population is around 12%, with differences among member states from 9.3% in
Greece to 15.2% in Spain. The 2001 publication by Eurostat is based on the findings of the
European Community Household Panel (ECHP) which is a longitudinal survey
covering 130.000 European Citizens aged from 16 to 64 years old. In this survey
participants were asked whether they had a chronical, physical or mental health problem, illness
or disability, and whether they were hampered (severely or to some extent) in their
daily activities by this problem. Using the data of 1996, Eurostat reaches the
conclusion that around 13% of the EU 14 population is being severely hampered (4%), or hampered
to some extent (9%) (See diagram 2). There are no significant differences,
according to Eurostat on disability rates between genders. 14% of men reported to have a
disability compared to 15 % of women.
Diagram 2

Significant disparities in the disability rates were found among the Member
States ranging from 21.2% of the Finnish population to only 7.4% in Italy. (See diagram 3). The
reason for this disparity is probably due to different cultural perceptions, levels of
awareness, quality of services provided, and integration of people with disabilities. This
same caution in analysing data has to be applied to our own study.
Diagram 3

Examining age specific prevalence rates among the Member States, an
exponentially increasing trend with age was found (see diagram 5). Finland portrays the
highest progression rates followed by Portugal, France, Austria and having Italy and the
lowest.

1.2.1 Education
Several studies have revealed that education affects significantly the social
and working life of people. School constitutes the first step towards socialization outside
of the family environment. The access of disabled people to school and the continuation of
their studies are often difficult, jeopardising their integration into the labour market.
According to the ECHP study, only 9% of those severely hampered and 14% of
those hampered to some extent reach university education, in comparison with 18% of
people with no disabilities. Focusing further on the severely hampered we can identify
significant differences among the member states in second and third level education
attainment (see diagram 4). Among the countries considered in our study, severely hampered
persons in France and Finland would have the highest chances to complete third level
education, followed by Spain, Austria, and Italy. Similar trends were identified for those
who are hampered to some extent.
Diagram 4
1.2.2 Employment
The low education rate of disabled people in second and third level education
is clearly shown in diagram 4, hindering their opportunities to access the labour
market on an equal basis.
Diagram 5 (on the previous page) shows the percentage of disabled people in
working age in the EU countries compared to the overall population, according to various
age intervals. The diagram illustrates on one hand the importance of the share of
the disabled population potentially able to work, and on the other hand the
important number of people who become disabled in the course of their working career.
Throughout the European Union, people with disabilities confront significant
barriers both in finding and keeping a job. According to the European Community Household
Panel, a person in the active age (16-64 years) has a probability of 66% to find
a job or develop a business. For a person with a moderate disability the probability
becomes 47% and for a disabled person with severe disability the probability is reduced
to 25%.
The level of employment of disabled women is considerably lower. Among women
with a severe disability only 25% are working, with a very high percentage of inactivity. Also only 44% of women with a moderate disability are in employment.
However, due to the overall lower level of participation of women in the labour market, compared with men, the differences between disabled and non-disabled
women in participation to the labour market are less important than between men.
Also the survey does not take into account the level of activity of mothers of
children with disabilities, which often have to leave the labour market for caring.
In diagram 6 (Eurostat source) the employment rates per country for people
who are severely hampered, or hampered to some extent in comparison to those that are
not hampered are portrayed.
Diagram 6

The findings of diagram 6 reveal that some countries like Finland, France and
Austria, which have achieved high rates of employment for their population, manage to
maintain high levels of employment for disabled people. Inversely, countries
like Greece and Spain with relatively lower levels of participation rates in the
employment sector provide limited opportunities to disabled people to access the labour
market.
The findings of the ECHP study highlight the demographic and socio-economic
differences related to disabled persons in selected EU countries. The
significant disparities in the education and employment status among the Member States are
to be attributed to different policies and labour market structures developed by
the respective countries. It should also be emphasized that the aggregate indicators
presented per country are based on the views of the surveyed individuals.
Further information will be available from the European Union Labour Force
Survey in 2002, which will include a module people with disabilities.
Disabled People in the European Union – summary findings
|
There is a lack of comparable data in the European Union on disabled people,
and their participation in society. The only available information comes from two
isolated publications of the European Union Statistical Office, Eurostat.
According to the first study, published in 1995, the proportion of disabled
people in relation to the total population varies from 9.3% in Greece to 15.2% in Spain,
reaching on an average at EU level 12%. This data is confirmed by the European Household Community Panel survey , conducted in 1996 for Eurostat in 14 EU
member states, which included questions on disability/health status. The results
reveal that around 13% of the EU population is being severely hampered (4%), or
hampered to some extent (9%).
These publications provide further information on the educational level of
disabled people: only 9% of those severely hampered and 14% of those hampered to some
extent complete university education. There is a significant difference on
educational attainment in the different countries.
Furthermore, while for a person in the active age (16-64 years) the
probability to find a job or develop a business is of 66%; for a person with a moderate disability
this probability lowers to 47% and for a disabled person with severe disability the
probability is reduced to 25%.
|

2. PURPOSE AND METHOD OF THE STUDY
This study seeks to examine the European Social model in conjunction with disability policies. The majority of the EU countries have adopted a wide range
of measures to promote social cohesion and integration of people with
disabilities.
However, despite the good intentions, further efforts need to be made in order
to address effectively this problem. Several studies conducted in Europe and
elsewhere have reached the following conclusions:
-
Disabled people are particularly vulnerable to social
exclusion.
-
The average family income is substantially lower for a
household with a disabled person.
-
A clear correlation exists between the severity of the
impairment and the degree of poverty and exclusion.
-
Disabled women are frequent victims of poverty and social
exclusion.
Disabled people living in Institutions do not generally
encounter dire financial poverty, however, they do experience extreme social exclusion.
The purpose of our study is to develop on the basis of the above findings a
fully harmonized methodology investigating the causal factors of poverty and
social exclusion among disabled people in seven European Countries: Austria,
Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Sweden.
The overall approach of the study is based on a selection of comparable
quantitative and qualitative indicators on policy decisions, attitudes
and perceptions concerning Social Exclusion of disabled people.
Because of the limitations due to the nature and means of the project, results
obtained could not be as reliable as the Eurostat (ECHP survey) data quoted in
the previous section. For this reason we have decided to concentrate our
research on qualitative rather than quantitative data in the areas covered by
the ECHP or to attempt a quantitative survey in those fields not considered,
such as access to goods and services.
In order to achieve this, a fully harmonised questionnaire was addressed to
opinion leaders from disability organisations in seven EU Countries with the
purpose to obtain policy relevant information for the European Disability Forum
and its members to design effective social policies against social
exclusion.
Given the variety of Welfare models in Europe, the comparison of social rights
and policies across all member states is a difficult task. Hence from a
methodological point of view, the adoption of a bottom up approach, which would
start from a country level analysis and move up to Commission's level would face
considerable problems. It was then decided to adopt a top down analysis starting
from the European Union's policies and objectives on a "New European Social
Inclusion Strategy" and move down to Countries and Disability
organisations.
Diagram 7 summarises the objectives adopted by the Nice European Council
in December 2000. The objectives are set around the following issues:
1) Promote participation in the labour market
The main aim of this objective is to prevent exclusion from the
labour market by promoting employability, by developing adequate training policies and
human resource management in order to promote better access to employment of the most
vulnerable groups, and by promoting the reconciliation of work and family life
including the issue of dependent care.
2) Facilitating access to resources, rights, goods and services for all
Universal access to democracy and social rights is a fundamental
principle for all EU countries. Nevertheless several studies have revealed that
the greatest causes of social exclusion are due to limited access to social
protection schemes and health care, as well as to a wide range of services and
rights including education, justice, housing, transport, culture, sport and
leisure.
Policies must be put in place in order to provide access to rights and public
and private services to all, including in situations of dependency, while
accompanying measures must be put in place for the benefit of people at risk of exclusion.
3) To prevent risks of exclusion
Several Eurobarometer surveys have shown that the major risks of
poverty and social exclusion are associated with long term unemployment, alcohol and drug
abuse, chronic illness, family break-ups, social welfare cuts, indebtedness, school
drop-out, and homelessness. Social policies of a preventive nature should be more targeted
at those groups, such as children, the elderly and disabled people, which are
more vulnerable to the above risks. Moreover homelessness is often linked to mental
health
problems.
Furthermore this objective highlights the risks of exclusion linked to the
development of the knowledge base society, and in particular calls Member states, to take
into account the needs of disabled people.
4) To help the most vulnerable
Disabled women and men are facing high risks of persistent
poverty and experience social exclusion in many aspects of everyday living. Member States are invited
to develop specific policies and actions targeted at the most vulnerable groups,
and to incorporate them in all other objectives.
Our study aims at the identification of these risks in order to encourage
Member States to develop effective policies in all the areas covered by the social
inclusion strategy.
5) To mobilise all relevant bodies
The fight against social exclusion should be mainstreamed in
overall policy by making social services more responsive to peoples' needs, and
developing appropriate coordination procedures and structures. This will be
achieved by mobilising Public authorities at all levels, by enhancing
partnership and dialogue between all relevant public and the private bodies by taking into account the views expressed by
social partners, social services providers, and in particular of people
suffering exclusions
and organisations representing them. The Council explicitly recognizes that
objectives 3 and 4 are relevant to women and men with a disability and highlights the need
to develop policies in order to ensure "access to knowledge-based society and
information technology". The relevance of the Council's objectives to
disability policies is depicted in the following diagram.
Diagram 7
EUROPEAN OBJECTIVES FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION
Taking into account the objectives adopted by the European Council, we
have defined our research targets. The policy relevant areas for collecting
harmonized social exclusion indicators are described in diagram 8 and include both income
based and social participation based indicators.
Diagram 8
OBJECTIVES OF OUR STUDY
|